羡慕兴趣驱动型人对事情的热爱
[复制链接] 分享：
放眼整个人类社会都出类拔萃的，大概这一位算得上：
乔布斯在斯坦福大学毕业典礼上的著名演讲（stay hungry, stay foolish也出自于此）。其中就有这么一段，挺有道理也挺有感染力的："Sometimes life hits you in the head with a brick. Don’t lose faith. I’m convinced that the only thing that kept me going was that I loved what I did. You’ve got to find what you love. And that is as true for your work as it is for your lovers. Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle. As with all matters of the heart, you’ll know when you find it. And, like any great relationship, it just gets better and better as the years roll on. So keep looking until you find it. Don’t settle."
——‘You’ve got to find what you love,’ Jobs says
This is a prepared text of the Commencement address delivered by Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Computer and of Pixar Animation Studios, on June 12, 2005.https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2005/06/youve-got-find-love-jobs-says
之前这位开发游戏的网友 zqc：
https://bbs.pku.edu.cn/v2/post-read.php?bid=55&threadid=18850982
也很让人佩服。
Mirabel (幸运熊) 在 ta 的帖子中提到：
兴趣驱动型的人是怎样的人呢？有点羡慕那些很纯粹地爱着一件事的人，尤其是在贵校社团众多的氛围里。小镇做题家永远只敢随大流选对的，姑且自称为利益驱动型人格吧。即使到了有时间精力的时候，也很难有动力去真正发展一个爱好。所以现在面临职业选择问题还是一直迷茫...
签名档
我哋呢班大公仔~
《激情的陷阱》这本书里对这段演说有别的解读，大意是激情会强化过度劳动的继续，未必是一件好事。
changhedayi (长翮大翼) 在 ta 的帖子中提到：
放眼整个人类社会都出类拔萃的，大概这一位算得上：
乔布斯在斯坦福大学毕业典礼上的著名演讲（stay hungry, stay foolish也出自于此）。其中就有这么一段，挺有道理也挺有感染力的："Sometimes life hits you in the head with a brick. Don’t lose faith. I’m convinced that the only thing that kept me going was that I loved what I did. You’ve got to find what you love. And that is as true for your work as it is for your lovers. Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle. As with ……
签名档
俯身为君系鞋带，幸福有此谦卑态。
谢谢分享。
我看这两句摘要，有点意思：
https://book.douban.com/annotation/113938342/
The author found that socioeconomically privileged passion-seeks are more likely to end up in stable, well-paid work related with their passion, while seekers from lower class families are more likely to end up in precarious employment far afield of their passion.
引自第12页
Broadly.This book seeks not only to examine the passion principle as a schema informing individual career decision making, but also how the passion principle contributes to structural and cultural processes of social inequality.
引自第12页
简介：
https://www.ucpress.edu/books/the-trouble-with-passion/paper
About the Book
Probing the ominous side of career advice to "follow your passion," this data-driven study explains how the passion principle fails us and perpetuates inequality by class, gender, and race; and it suggests how we can reconfigure our relationships to paid work.
"Follow your passion" is a popular mantra for career decision-making in the United States. Passion-seeking seems like a promising path for avoiding the potential drudgery of a life of paid work, but this "passion principle"—seductive as it is—does not universally translate. The Trouble with Passion reveals the significant downside of the passion principle: the concept helps culturally legitimize and reproduce an exploited, overworked white-collar labor force and broadly serves to reinforce class, race, and gender segregation and inequality.
Grounding her investigation in the paradoxical tensions between capitalism's demand for ideal workers and our cultural expectations for self-expression, sociologist Erin A. Cech draws on interviews that follow students from college into the workforce, surveys of US workers, and experimental data to explain why the passion principle is such an attractive, if deceptive, career decision-making mantra, particularly for the college educated. Passion-seeking presumes middle-class safety nets and springboards and penalizes first-generation and working-class young adults who seek passion without them. The ripple effects of this mantra undermine the promise of college as a tool for social and economic mobility. The passion principle also feeds into a culture of overwork, encouraging white-collar workers to tolerate precarious employment and gladly sacrifice time, money, and leisure for work they are passionate about. And potential employers covet, but won't compensate, passion among job applicants. This book asks, What does it take to center passion in career decisions? Who gets ahead and who gets left behind by passion-seeking? The Trouble with Passion calls for citizens, educators, college administrators, and industry leaders to reconsider how we think about good jobs and, by extension, good lives.
这句话：
Passion-seeking presumes middle-class safety nets and springboards and penalizes first-generation and working-class young adults who seek passion without them.
挺重要的：追求激情以中产阶级的安全网和跳板为前提，而那些追求激情却没有这些（前提）的第一代和工薪阶层年轻人则受到惩罚。
但其实回到乔布斯的演讲：他提到“ I loved what I did.”是在自己被董事会踢出自己创建的公司时，自己的想法：I still loved what I did. The turn of events at Apple had not changed that one bit. I had been rejected, but I was still in love. And so I decided to start over.
或许可以认为乔布斯这时候还是积累了财富资本可以重新开始，让他有勇气去driven by passion
但也或许可以看作是一个人身处自己最低谷时，也义无反顾，不放弃自己的passion.
好像也都说得通，尤其是当你考虑乔布斯几乎算是白手起家的。
但还是挺值得思考的：阶层的差距和固化，所带来的个体上升通道和评价体系的差异，可能会使个体的激情：从创造自身价值的利器，变为致使你任人宰割的囚具。
Hayflick (又笨又傻的小菜鸡) 在 ta 的帖子中提到：
《激情的陷阱》这本书里对这段演说有别的解读，大意是激情会强化过度劳动的继续，未必是一件好事。
签名档
丢掉幻想，准备斗争。